Best Women's Hiking Shoes of 2026

Whether you’re on a casual day hike or hitting the trail overnight, there’s a hiking shoe up for the task. The Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX is our favorite overall hiking shoe for its versatility, reliability, and durability, but the Merrell Moab Speed 2 is a close second at a lower price. Compared to traditional hiking boots, hiking shoes feature a low-top design that reduces weight on your feet, allowing you to cover ground quickly. For a broader view of the market, consider our article on the best hiking shoes, which covers both men's and women's styles. We also have a line-up of the best waterproof hiking shoes. 
 

Our Women's Hiking Shoe Research

• Best Overall Women's Hiking Shoe: Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX
• Runner Up at a Great Price: Merrell Moab Speed 2
• Best Budget Hiking Shoe: Merrell Moab 3
• Best Cushioned Women's Hiking Shoe: Hoka Speedgoat 7
• Best Supportive Shoe for Backpacking: La Sportiva Spire GTX
• A Comfortable Shoe for Hard-to-Please Feet: Altra Lone Peak 9
• Best Women's Hiking Shoe for Wide Feet: Topo Athletic Terraventure 4 WP
• Our Other Favorite Women's Hiking Shoes
• How Do I Know if a Shoe Fits Right in the Store?
• Tested & Dismissed Women's Hiking Shoes
• Women's Hiking Shoe Comparison Table
• Our Women's Hiking Shoe Testing Process
• How to Choose Women's Hiking Shoes
• Women's Hiking Shoe FAQ

Best Overall Women's Hiking Shoe

Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX ($175)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 6 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-waterproof available)
What we like: Stable and durable without feeling too heavy.
What we don’t: It's not very plush, and the fit is narrow out of the box.

Salomon’s X Ultra has been one of our favorite hiking shoes for years, offering an exceptional combination of comfort, on-trail performance, and durability for everything from casual day hikes to long overnight missions. The latest version in this line boasts significant updates over the previous version, including a more stable chassis, a wider toe box, and a durable Kevlar upper that has yet to show any signs of wear after rigorous testing. We like this shoe’s outsole, too; it’s very grippy and confidence-inspiring on tricky terrain. And the lacing system is stellar, locking the heel down in the back of the shoe and keeping it there even on steep descents. Overall, the X Ultra 5 is an ongoing favorite thanks to its fantastic mix of agility, durability, and protection, and, while sparse, there’s enough cushioning underfoot for full days with a loaded pack. 

No shoe is perfect, and we have a few gripes with this design. First, as mentioned above, the shoe isn’t the most cushioned underfoot. Replacing the insole with something more forgiving was helpful on high-mileage days. The midfoot is also narrow, and might not be comfortable for every foot. And not everyone will love the Quicklace system, which isn’t as easy to customize as traditional lacing systems. If tightened too much, we felt the laces digging into the tops of our feet (a quick loosening of the laces helped, however). Like every shoe, we recommend trying this one on before buying. If it fits, it's a good choice for most hiking missions.  
Read more: Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX review
See the Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX
 

Runner Up at a Great Price

Merrell Moab Speed 2 ($145)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 3.4 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Extremely well-rounded—this shoe checks all the right boxes for most hikers.
What we don’t: Roomy toe box and insecure heel make this less secure on technical terrain.

The Moab Speed is a great choice for day hikes and weight-conscious backpackers. Unlike the dated look of the traditional Moab line (such as the Moab 3), the Speed is sleeker and performance-oriented. It offers a healthy amount of support and protection from a generous toe and heel cap and firm midsole. The outsole is very capable, and we liked the closely spaced lugs for hiking over soft ground. The ample padding along the collar and the foam in the midsole make this shoe comfortable, too. The end result is a hardwearing yet comfortable hiking shoe that toes the line between weight-savings and on-trail performance better than most—and the price is right.

The Moab Speed 2 will get the job done for most day hikers and ultralight backpackers, but it wouldn’t be our first choice for technical objectives that involve a lot of off-trail travel or scrambling. Our biggest gripes with the latest model are the wide toe box and lack of heel security, which results in a sloppy feel. If you’re headed out on challenging terrain or with a heavy pack, a sturdier shoe is a better choice. That said, if you’re planning on sticking to established trails, the Speed 2 is sure to get the job done.
Read more: Merrell Moab Speed 2 GTX review
See the Merrell Moab Speed 2
 

Best Budget Women's Hiking Shoe

Merrell Moab 3 ($140)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 9.1 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: A durable shoe for an affordable price.
What we don’t: Heavy and not built for technical terrain.

For those who prefer a more traditional hiking shoe, there’s a lot to love about the Moab 3. Merrell found a winning formula, combining a comfortable fit with a sturdy build for a reasonable price. The leather upper provides greater protection and durability than synthetic materials like those on the Moab Speed, while mesh panels offer better ventilation than an all-leather model. The outsole is grippy, too, which isn’t always the case with budget models. All in all, the Moab 3 is a hardwearing and time-tested solution for both day hikers and casual overnighters. 

While the Moab 3 checks all the boxes for moderate trails, the shoe is not meant for fast-paced or off-trail endeavors. Though there’s a lot of underfoot protection in the beefy lugs and stiff midsole, it lacks support along the collar and tongue. The outsole also struggled on muddy trails. What’s more, it’s one of the heaviest shoes on our list, and will feel cumbersome if you’re used to a more trail runner-inspired design. But for folks who don’t need cutting-edge performance, the Moab 3 is a wonderful hiking shoe with a long, proven track record.
Read more: Merrell Moab 3 review (men's version)
See the Merrell Moab 3
 

Best Cushioned Women's Hiking Shoe

Hoka Speedgoat 7 ($165)

Category: Trail runner
Weight: 1 lb. 0.6 oz.
Waterproof: No
What we like: A lightweight and well-cushioned shoe, great for moving quickly on the trail.
What we don’t: Overbuilt and tall stack height might feel unstable.

Hoka's lightweight, cushioned trail running shoes, like the Speedgoat 7, have been adopted by the thru-hiking community as durable, capable shoes that meet the demands of hikers and minimalist backpackers. The Speedgoat features a tall (4mm), cushioned midsole that isolates you from uneven terrain, while still providing ample firmness for covering serious ground. The cushioning also makes them a nice choice for those prone to plantar fasciitis or other foot pain. The Vibram outsole is grippy with deep, tightly spaced lugs, and we appreciate the athletic feel of the rockered sole. The latest version felt more stable than the previous 6 during testing, but the supercritical EVA midsole compound kept them feeling energetic and springy. This is a versatile shoe that feels zippy on fast runs but comfortable for slower runs or combo runs/hikes.

However, there’s no denying this shoe is overbuilt. While we appreciate the reflective material and stiffer heel base, and like that the overlays add support through the shank, the shoe will likely be too much for casual runners and hikers. And though it’s only an aesthetic gripe, we think the color combinations are tough to look at, and don’t cross over well into casual use. And though this version is stabler than the last, it's still too tippy for us to recommend it for technical pursuits. But there’s a reason this shoe is a thru-hiker favorite, and its comfort continues to impress us in each update. Finally, if you're pining for the older models, Hoka re-released its iconic Speedgoat 2, with a return to its former glove-like fit and precise on-trail performance. 
Read more: Hoka Speedgoat 6 review
See the Hoka Speedgoat 7
 

Best Supportive Shoe for Backpacking

La Sportiva Spire GTX ($219)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 10.2 oz.
Waterproof: Yes
What we like: Raised collar offers more ankle support than most shoes here.
What we don’t: Heavy and pricey.

We hesitate to recommend many of the shoes here for much more than hiking with a daypack, but the La Sportiva Spire GTX is an exception. The Spire is a backpacking-ready hiking shoe with a high collar and a design La Sportiva calls a "low-cut hiking boot." If ankle support is high on your priority list, the Spire is a great choice. What’s more, the well-cushioned yet stiff midsole offers a great balance of comfort, protection, and support, which comes in handy for high-mileage days and off-trail scrambling. Throw in excellent grip, good breathability for a waterproof design, and the top-shelf quality we’ve come to expect from this Italian climbing brand, and you have one of the most capable hiking shoes.

But the Spire isn’t for everyone: It’s the most expensive pick on this list, and the stiff and heavy build means it's more shoe than most day hikers need.  The Spire is also only offered in a waterproof version, which is great for early-season snow and colder weather but prone to overheating on warm, dry days. It’s also worth noting that we found these shoes fit large, so you might want to size down if you want to maintain some precision on the trail. Most day hikers will want to look elsewhere, but for backpackers and those traveling off-trail or above treeline in areas like the High Sierra or Colorado Rockies, the Spire offers an excellent combination of support, durability, and protection.
Read more: La Sportiva Spire GTX review (men's version)
See the La Sportiva Spire GTX
 

A Comfortable Shoe for Hard-to-Please Feet

Altra Lone Peak 9 ($145)

Category: Trail runner 
Weight: 1 lb. 2.6 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Flat and roomy footbed offers slipper-like comfort.
What we don’t: Can feel sluggish and imprecise on technical terrain; middling durability.

If you’re among the hikers who suffer from pressure points, hot spots, and blisters, this one’s for you. Popularized by the barefoot running movement, Altra’s zero-drop offerings are arguably the most ergonomic and comfortable on the trail, and their flagship Lone Peak has earned legendary status among the thru-hiking community. With a flat (zero-drop) footbed and an extra-roomy toe box, this shoe allows the foot to stay in its naturally pronated and splayed position, which is great news for those with wide or finicky feet. True to its trail-worthy intentions, the design also features a rock plate and gaiter attachments. We’ve recommended the Lone Peak to dozens of friends and acquaintances who’ve struck out with more traditional hiking shoes and have yet to lead anyone astray. 

Compared to past iterations of the Lone Peak, the 9 has a more aggressive outsole and a lacing system with optional pull-through points for a more customizable fit. Altra also simplified the upper from the 8’s streamlined design, with no-sew overlays to reduce peeling and increased durability in the ripstop mesh. The 9 has better durability in the upper than previous versions, though the outsole tread dulls quickly, and the shoes lose structure more quickly than the Speedgoat or Brooks Cascadia. And while the Lone Peak is comfortable, we’ve also found it to be sluggish and under-cushioned. You get 25 millimeters of stack height, which can feel low for people used to taller midsoles. The 9 is also offered in a 9+ model, which retails for more and features a more durable Vibram outsole.
Read more: Altra Lone Peak 9 review
See the Altra Lone Peak 9
 

Best Women's Hiking Shoe for Wide Feet

Topo Athletic Terraventure 4 WP ($155)

Category: Hiking Shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 4.2 oz.
Waterproof: Yes
What we like: Wide toe box shoe with underfoot support.
What we don’t: Fit runs small, stiffer than a barefoot shoe.

Wide toe box hiking shoes are becoming more popular of late, and one of our favorites in this space is Topo Athletic’s Terraventure 4 WP. This shoe boasts out-of-the-box comfort, and we didn’t experience any hotspots during testing on the steep, sloppy trails of the Pacific Northwest. Compared to the Altra Lone Peak above, which also features a wide toe box, the Terraventure is stiffer underfoot and provides more arch support. It comes down to your preferences, but we preferred the stabler feel of the Terraventure over the Lone Peak when hiking on rocky trails and, at times, on long-distance hikes with heavy packs. The outsole is grippy on a range of terrain, and they’ve held up well to off-trail wanderings and bushwhacking. Tack on a palatable price, and the Terraventure is a hard shoe to pass up.

Those looking for the true barefoot experience will want to stick with the Lone Peaks over the Terraventures. Not only is the Terraventure stiffer underfoot, but the upper is as well, which may take some time to break in (we didn’t have any discomfort, however). Our biggest gripe is the sizing: All Topo Athletic shoes we’ve tested, including the Terraventure, run small. But sizing up by half a size results in a perfect fit. The Terraventure 4 WP is also waterproof, which is nice for those who frequent muddy trails, but it isn’t the most breathable choice for mid-summer hiking. Topo Athletic makes a non-waterproof version called the Terraventure 5, which we haven’t tested, but we expect to perform similarly to the 4 WP here. But for those who want protection year-round, the Terraventure 4 WP is an excellent choice.
See the Topo Athletic Terraventure 4 WP
 

Our Other Favorite Women's Hiking Shoes
 

A Great Trail-Runner Hybrid Hiking Shoe

Brooks Cascadia 19 ($150)

Category: Trail runner
Weight: 1 lb. 3.6 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: A comfortable yet supportive trail runner.
What we don’t: Not a standout in any discipline. 

Now in its 19th iteration, the Brooks Cascadia is one of the longest-standing trail runners on the market and popular in the thru-hiking community. This shoe bridges the gap for speed-focused hikers with the support and protection you need for long-distance trails alongside a hefty dose of cushioning. And the Cascadia 19 is one of the lighter shoes on this list. The updated model reduced the drop from 8 millimeters to 6, while the cushion increased slightly, giving the 19 a bump in ground protection without losing the rebound we love from the energetic, nitrogen-infused midsole.

The Brooks Cascadia, Altra Lone Peak, and Hoka Speedgoat are all excellent choices for hikers who prefer a trail runner over a traditional hiking shoe. All three are lightweight and more flexible than classic hiking options, though you'll lose some support and longevity with the softer outsoles and mesh-heavy uppers. We'd recommend the Cascadia over the Altra or Hoka as a do-it-all shoe that works for a range of hikers. The Cascadia has more cushion and precision than the Lone Peak 9, but feels more stable than the Speedgoat. The fit is also more generalized: increased room in the toe box over the Speedgoat without the sloppy feeling we encounter with the Lone Peak. We rank it here because it doesn’t specialize in anything specific, but it does have a place as a great quiver-of-one shoe for fast-paced hikers. 
See the Brooks Cascadia 19
 

A Well-Rounded Hiking Shoe at a Good Price

Keen Hightrail Waterproof ($150)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 7.6 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-waterproof available)
What we like: Stable, comfortable, and durable.
What we don’t: Not a performance hiker.

Keen has been in the footwear business a long time, and while they’re better known for their classic-looking hiking boots, the Hightrail hiking shoe sports a modern aesthetic and well-rounded feature set. It’s not as cushioned as the Hoka Speedgoat, but it strikes a nice middle ground between underfoot squish and stability, which secures it squarely in the hiking shoe category. With plenty of arch support and a reliable outsole, it is a great companion for a range of trails and conditions. The upper is stiff and durable, and we have no concerns that this shoe will last over the long haul.

The Hightrail is one of our go-tos for general hikes that don’t require speed or precision, but it isn’t specialized in any one discipline. We wouldn’t recommend it for trail running, and it’s not lightweight enough for fast packers. We also have some minor complaints about the shoes' quality. To start, it doesn’t offer the most toe protection, so you’ll want to be careful on rocky trails. The stiff collar also takes some time to break in, and we experienced minor irritation when we took our pair out for the first time. These aren’t dealbreakers for us, however, and we recommend the shoe for hikers who stick to established trails and want to maximize the bang for their buck. 
See the Keen Hightrail Waterproof
 

A Great Lightweight Hiking Shoe

Saucony Peregrine 16 ($150)

Category: Trail runner
Weight: 1 lb. 0.9 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: A lightweight shoe with agility, protection, and stability.
What we don’t: Technically not the lightest shoe on our list.

Lightweight gear is trendy in the outdoor market lately, and for good reason: Reducing weight usually means you can travel further and faster. One of our favorite lightweight hiking shoes is Saucony’s Peregrine 16. Though it weighs just over one pound for the pair, this shoe offers a stable, planted feel, with deep lugs on the outsole that provide excellent grip on steep hills and loose trails. It’s not as cushioned as some of the other shoes on this list, but it has plenty of underfoot protection. If your goal is to move fast in alpine terrain, or to find a shoe that can keep up on both a hike and a jog, the Peregrine is worth checking out.

Technically, the Peregrine is not the lightest shoe on this list. That award goes to the Hoka Speedgoat 7, which has the Peregrine beat by a fraction of an ounce. That said, the two are very different shoes. The Speedgoat is highly cushioned, but doesn’t have the stable feel of the Peregrine. It’s also not nearly as precise as the Peregrine, which matters on more technical terrain. We do have a few complaints with the Peregrine, however, including the narrow fit, which might be uncomfortable for those with high-volume feet. We also had some trouble securing the lacing over the whole foot. Still, the Peregrine impressed us in testing and remains one of our go-tos for fast hiking.
See the Saucony Peregrine 16
 

A Great Hiking Shoe for Off-Trail Scrambling

Scarpa Ribelle Run 2 ($199)

Category: Running shoe 
Weight: 1 lb. 1.3 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Great traction and support for technical hikes.
What we don’t: Stiffer than most running shoes and overkill for casual hikers.

If you’re looking for a shoe that can keep up in mountainous terrain and technical scrambling, the Scarpa Ribelle Run is a great choice. Scarpa’s expertise in mountain sports shines through with this shoe, and we like how it blends the stride power and cushion of a running shoe with the support and precision of an approach shoe. To be fair, it’s far from high-cushioned designs like the Speedgoat, but there’s just enough squish to keep fatigue at bay. The underfoot stability is where this shoe shines, as is the outsole, which grips easily on rock and soft, muddy trails. And, as we’ve come to expect from the brand, the Ribelle Run is very durable all around, and we don’t have doubts that it will last us several years to come.

In our opinion, the “Run” in the name of this shoe is slightly misleading. It’s a stiff shoe, and while we’ve had luck running in it on soft, forested trails, those used to more flexible trail runners might not find it as comfortable. The fit is also snug, which is important for toe precision in the mountains, but it might not work for everyone's foot shape. We also have mixed feelings about the cinch-lacing system: It’s easy to overtighten, and the lace catch doesn’t do the best job at keeping them out of the way. Small gripes aside, this shoe is a high-performing piece of gear that is great for mountain athletes who often stray off the trail and scramble to the tops of peaks.
See the Scarpa Ribelle Run 2
 

A Trail-to-Town Hiking Shoe

Danner Trail 2650 ($190)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 2.0 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Light and nimble without sacrificing protection or traction; high on style points. 
What we don’t: Expensive, ungainly heel counter, and not the most stable shoe here.

Danner was originally known for its work boots, but the longtime footwear brand has made a nice transition to hikers over the past few years. The running shoe-inspired Trail 2650 is clear about its intentions: With the Pacific Crest Trail's mileage in its name, this shoe is designed to tackle some serious ground. The Trail 2650 is comfortable right out of the box, grippy with a Vibram outsole, and competitively lightweight (especially for a partial-leather design). Finally, it manages to do what most hiking shoes don’t: look good while performing. All in all, we’re impressed with the direction that Danner is headed, and the Trail 2650 lineup has received rave reviews since its release several years ago.

The version of the Trail 2650 included here isn’t waterproof, but Danner also makes a GTX model, along with a Mid GTX for those who want more ankle protection. It’s also worth taking a look at the Danner Trail 2650 Campo, which tones down the rubber heel counter and adds a lightweight mesh liner. Don’t expect high stability from any of the shoes in the Trail 2650 series—we hesitate to wear them with a heavy pack—but for day hiking and hitting the town for lunch afterward, the Trail 2650s are a standout. 
Read more: Danner Trail 2650 review (men's version)
See the Danner Trail 2650
 

How do I know if a shoe fits right in the store?

If possible, we highly recommend trying a shoe on before purchasing. Here are a few important things to note when you do: First, it's best to bring the sock you will be hiking in for a more accurate fit. If you wear custom insoles, be sure to bring those too. Don't forget to account for swelling when sizing. Some recommend sizing up a full half size to accommodate swelling, but do so with caution; too-big shoes can lead to blisters or sloppy footwork (try on your normal size and a half size larger to determine the best choice). When trying on the shoes, spend some time in them, walk around the store to get a feel for the fit. Pay specific attention to heel slippage, toes striking the front of the foot, hotspots, or any discomfort; those are all signs that a shoe doesn't fit. And lastly, don't be afraid to direct your concerns to an employee working in the shoe department. It's likely they'll have a recommendation for your foot shape, experience level, and budget.
 

Tested & Dismissed Women's Hiking Shoes

In this update, we removed the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX because, after testing it in Alberta last summer, we found it narrow, clunky, and heavy. It was also much firmer than most Hokas, and the blown rubber on the outside of the shoe is prone to wear. 

We also dismissed the On Cloudrock Waterproof Low because it is expensive for the performance it provided. The tread isn't as trustworthy as the other designs in our list, and the lacing loosened easily on hikes, forcing us to stop and retie the shoes often.

The La Sportiva TX4 Evo was replaced with the Scarpa Ribelle Run 2 as our favorite technical-hike shoe. They are very different shoes: the TX4 Evo is a traditional approach shoe with a stiff underfoot and a narrow toe box, which are great for scrambling but uncomfortable for longer hikes. The Ribelle is more well-rounded and comfortable while still being trustworthy on tricky terrain. For more information, see our in-depth review of the TX4 Evo.

Lastly, there are a few shoes we dismissed simply because they didn't stand out from the competition, including the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 Low Gore-Tex, Keen Targhee IV Vent, and Salomon Elixer Activ GTX.
 

Women's Hiking Shoe Comparison Table

About Our Testing Process

Hiking shoes come in all shapes and sizes, from hefty leather designs for overnight backpacking to trail runners adopted by fast-and-light thru-hikers. Contributing editor Maggie Slepian managed the guide starting in 2024, drawing on her decade of technical gear testing and thru-hiking experience to refine her recommendations. Senior editor Maddie Downie took on the guide in 2026, refining the list to include her recommendations from her time hiking and backpacking in Washington state, Colorado, and the greater American West. 

Our current lineup of 12 women’s hiking shoes is the result of our collective experiences both on and off the trail, along with feedback from our network of female testers and the online hiking community. When we test hiking shoes, we take them on everything from mellow day hikes to multi-day backpacking trips, paying attention to the amount of padding underfoot, the level of grip on various types of terrain, and the quality of everything from the hardware and laces to the upper and outsole. We also consider protection (both at the front of the shoe and underfoot), breathability, and overall fit. Our hiking shoes have taken us through early-season snow at 10,000 feet in Great Basin National Park, along soggy backpacking trails, through gritty desert sand, and along steep trails in British Columbia. As we continue testing, we’ll add and remove options above depending on their performance.
 

How to Choose Women's Hiking Shoes

• Hiking Footwear Types
• Weight
• Stability and Support
• Waterproofing
• Breathability
• Lacing Systems
• Upper Materials
• Midsoles: EVA Foam and TPU
• Outsoles and Traction
• Toe Protection
• Hiking Shoes vs. Hiking Boots
   

Hiking Footwear Types

Hiking Shoes
For most trails except highly technical terrain, a low-cut hiking shoe that sits just below the ankle is the best bet. The majority of these shoes are lightweight, trail-runner-inspired designs like the Merrell Moab Speed 2 and Topo Athletic Terraventure 4 WP, though holdouts include more traditional leather designs reminiscent of a low-top hiking boot, like the Merrell Moab 3. Regardless of style, most of these shoes offer ample stability, protection, and traction for tackling rough trails with a load, thanks to stiff midsoles and outsoles, toe caps, and reinforced uppers. Hiking shoes are also great options for folks needing a substantial shoe for daily wear. Just be aware that the outsoles will wear faster on pavement.
 

Trail Running Shoes
For fast-moving hikers, we’d recommend a trail running shoe. These shoes, including the Hoka Speedgoat, Altra Lone Peak, and Brooks Cascadia, are a lightweight option popular among thru-hikers and fast packers. However, trail runners weren't originally intended as backpacking footwear, and the flexible midsoles don’t provide as much support on technical terrain or while carrying a heavy load. They also have less durability, and the midsole packs out faster than tougher hiking shoes. But for day hikes or experienced backpackers, it's hard to knock the comfort you get with a flexible build and ample cushioning. You can find more of our picks in our guide to the best trail running shoes.
 

Approach Shoes
The third option has a narrow focus: climbers or hikers who need a grippy shoe to tackle steep, rocky terrain, often for the approach to a rock climb. Approach shoes are easy to spot: they have a large rubber toe rand, full-length, and a sticky, low-profile rubber outsole with rounded lugs for maximum grip on rock. These shoes can be comfortable on day hikes, but aren’t what we recommend as a daily driver. The tread isn't as secure on muddy trails, and they’re stiffer than most hiking shoes, which can mean discomfort on high-mileage days. Our list above includes a few hiking shoes that toe the line between hiking and approach shoes, such as the La Sportiva Spire GTX and the Scarpa Ribelle Run 2, both of which are stiff enough for technical hiking but have some underfoot squish for comfort over the long haul. But if your hikes include a lot of scrambling or rock hopping, an approach shoe can be an excellent choice. For a complete look, check out our article on the best approach shoes.
 

Weight

Over the past decade, one of the most significant advances in hiking shoes has been the move to lighter-weight designs. As a result, most shoes on our list weigh well under 2 pounds for the pair, with some dropping to just over 1 pound. By comparison, a traditional backpacking boot like the Asolo TPS 520 GV Evo weighs just under 4 pounds. It's true that the drop in ounces can sometimes affect long-term durability, but there are still a number of compelling options for traditionalists, including the leather Merrell Moab 3. But for most, a lightweight trail-runner-inspired shoe (such as the Saucony Peregrine 16) is the best choice for day hikes, peak bagging, and overnight trips. As long as the rest of your gear is equally light, there are very few sacrifices.
 

Stability and Support

Whether opting for a new-school synthetic model or a more traditional leather hiker, most hiking shoes retain good stability and support thanks to robust uppers, midsoles, and rigid soles. For example, despite its trail-runner appearance, the Scarpa Ribelle Run 2 features a stiff frame and a thicker sole that prioritize durability and stability. Hiking shoes also offer solid protection with toe caps, generous rands, and burly nylon or leather uppers. You don't get the added ankle support of a hiking boot, but most hiking shoes offer decent performance for tricky terrain or while carrying a load.
 

If you choose a lightweight trail runner, keep in mind that the trade-off is reduced stability and support. These shoes have more flexible midsoles, and the generous cushioning underfoot is great for comfort but offers less structure on off-camber sections of trail. The mesh upper of a trail runner also lacks around-the-foot protection, leaving your feet more vulnerable to roots and rocks. These are compromises that many day hikers (and well-conditioned backpackers) are willing to put up with for a more nimble, lightweight shoe. However, in most cases, we hesitate to recommend a trail running shoe for inexperienced hikers and difficult trails, including off-trail scrambling.
 

Waterproofing

Most of the hiking shoes here come in both waterproof and non-waterproof versions. The extra protection from a waterproof, breathable membrane is a nice security blanket if you plan to hike in the mountains or in shoulder-season conditions, where wet feet can grow cold quickly. In theory, these shoes should keep your feet dry during creek crossings, surprise rainfall, or if you hit snow on an early-season trek. If you go this route, we’ve found Gore-Tex models to work consistently well, and many in-house designs are similarly capable of keeping water out, though breathability is a different story.
 

However, there are a number of downsides to going with a waterproof shoe: The extra layer adds weight, significantly impacts breathability (discussed below), and often costs $20–$30 more. If you do get water inside your shoe, these won't drain as well and won’t dry out as quickly as a non-waterproof option. If you tend to get out mostly during the summer or live in a dry area, we recommend a non-waterproof shoe. Another option that we’ve adopted for snowy summer hikes is to pair a non-waterproof shoe with a waterproof sock. This lends a lot of versatility: You get protection when you need it, but your shoe will still dry out quickly after a dousing. For more on the waterproofing debate, see our article Do You Need Waterproof Hiking Shoes?
 

Breathability

Unfortunately, waterproof liners, even expensive Gore-Tex varieties, don’t breathe well. just as a waterproof jacket won’t be as breathable as a comparable non-waterproof version. Waterproof membranes restrict a shoe’s ability to pull moisture from your sweaty feet as efficiently as a non-waterproof upper. However, there is a range of breathability in non-waterproof shoes. Footwear made with lighter fabrics and a lot of mesh increases moisture transfer and airflow, keeping feet drier and drying out soggy socks faster. On the other hand, full-on leather shoes with built-in waterproofing are among the least breathable.
 

Lacing Systems

Laces—as well as the lacing system of hooks and eyelets—play an essential role in fit and comfort. If a shoe has a poor lacing system and tends to loosen, you’ll have to readjust it constantly. If the system doesn’t secure your heel well, friction from each step can create hot spots and blisters. If the culprit is just the laces themselves, it’s an easy fix: There are a number of quality replacement laces available. But if the system design doesn’t hold your foot, we recommend looking elsewhere.
 

Some models, including the Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX and Scarpa Ribelle Run 2, have a single-pull lacing system. The design is very convenient, and we’ve had no durability issues with it compared to traditional laces. One thing to keep in mind, however, is that you aren’t able to adjust the tension between eyelets, so the fit will be equally tight across the entire foot. In other words, those with finicky feet who need to fine-tune their laces for comfort may be better off avoiding quick-lace designs.
 

Upper Materials

Checking the shoe's construction can provide helpful insights into its performance. The type of material correlates directly with a shoe's longevity, water resistance, and breathability. Most often, hiking shoes are made with a mix of nylon, mesh, and leather to balance cost, weight savings, and durability. 

Synthetic Nylon and Mesh
Woven synthetic (often nylon) and open synthetic mesh panels are commonly used to improve breathability. These materials are not as well known for their durability, but they do a great job cutting weight and are generally easy to break in. Note that synthetic materials don't conform to your foot over time, and in most cases, the overall fit remains comfortable and snug. The majority of our favorite hiking shoes (and almost all modern designs) are made with synthetic materials, which provide a hard-to-beat balance of weight, durability, protection, and breathability.
 

Nubuck Leather
Made of full-grain leather but given a brushed finish that has a suede-like feel, nubuck leather is a common sight on heavier-duty hiking shoes. The soft-touch leather is lighter and more flexible than full-leather options and more durable than most nylons. It does fall short in breathability, however, and generally weighs more. As a result, it’s common to find a mix of leather and nylon mesh for abrasion resistance and breathability, as seen on the Danner Trail 2650 and Merrell Moab 3. If you’re looking to prioritize durability and protection above all else, a leather hiking shoe is a good choice, but these designs feel dated compared to modern synthetic shoes.
 

Midsoles: EVA Foam and TPU

The midsole of your hiking shoe cushions your stride, working as a shock absorber and providing a stable base so your feet don’t have to work so hard on off-camber terrain. Depending on the design, midsoles range from thin, lightweight in trail runners to stiff and substantial in heavier hiking shoes. Most include EVA, TPU, or a combination.

EVA
EVA foam midsoles are a common sight on running and hiking footwear. The cushy, soft material takes some of the sting out of both heel impact and forefoot spring and is lightweight. While nearly all shoes on this list use some sort of EVA, designs vary. For logging serious miles on tougher terrain, we prefer a firm, supportive midsole rather than too much cushioning. If we’re planning to move quickly on an easy trail, softer cushioning is a better bet and is commonly found in trail-running designs like the Hoka Speedgoat. However, soft midsoles tend to pack down over time, so expect these shoes to have a shorter lifespan than dedicated hiking shoes.
 

TPU
Thermoplastic polyurethane, or TPU, is a durable plastic commonly used in performance-oriented hiking shoes. Shoes with TPU underfoot are often less cushy than those with only EVA, but they will last longer and provide better protection and stability. In addition, they’ll keep their shape longer and won’t compress like EVA. Because both midsole types have valid applications and TPU is more expensive, it’s common for a manufacturer to use a TPU frame or heel for stability and toughness, and to add EVA underfoot for increased comfort. Finally, the absence of TPU is a good way to differentiate a trail running shoe from a hiking shoe. Most running designs forgo this plastic to stay flexible and cushioned, but the trade-off is reduced stability and less isolation from rough terrain.
 

Outsoles and Traction

One of the hallmarks of a hiking shoe is good traction on a variety of terrain. In ways casual footwear can never match, hiking and trail-running footwear are leaps and bounds better when the going gets rocky, slippery, and steep. Vibram is the gold standard for outsole rubber, but not all Vibram compounds should be treated equally: The rubber manufacturer tailors its blends and designs to the specific footwear and brand. Some shoes feature much larger, sharper lugs underfoot for serious grip in mud, while others prioritize sticky rubber for scrambling over rocks.
 

You don't need Vibram to have a safe time on the trail, however. Many brands use in-house outsoles on their shoes, and they can often match the performance of Vibram's offerings. Salomon's Contragrip outsoles are a great example of this, as seen on the X Ultra 5. Keen's All-Terrain outsole impressed us when testing the Hightrail Waterproof. And Scarpa's Presa outsole, as seen on the Ribelle Run 2, is among the grippiest we've tested.
 

Toe Protection

Most hiking trails are full of rocks, roots, and other potential hazards, so we usually recommend a hiking shoe with a toe cap. Hiking shoes typically have a full rubber toe cap, but trail runners sometimes have a trimmed-down version or none at all, which is one of the compromises in opting for a minimalist shoe. Approach shoes have exceptional protection with a standard wraparound rubber rand and stiff midsole and outsole.
 

Insoles

The stock insoles that come with most hiking shoes are generally cheap. For some, this might not make a difference, but for others, it’s what separates comfort from misery. Replacing your insoles with aftermarket models tailored to your foot size and shape can remedy most shoe maladies, and removing the stock midsoles is simple. New insoles can provide more or less volume to fill out the shoe, improve fit under the arch, and increase or decrease cushioning and impact absorption. We recommend checking out Superfeet insoles for their wide selection of options and trusted reputation in daily shoes, ski boots, and hiking footwear.

Hiking Shoes vs. Hiking Boots

One of the biggest trends we see across the outdoor space is the move towards lighter-weight gear. This is exemplified in the world of hiking footwear, where, in just a couple of short decades, we’ve gone from 4-pound leather boots being standard issue to most hikers now wearing lightweight hiking shoes or trail runners. However, hiking boots still have their place, particularly for rugged terrain and schlepping a heavy multi-day load. We also specifically recommend a mid-height shoe for those who need extra ankle protection.
 

The biggest point of differentiation between hiking shoes and boots is height: Shoes have a low-top fit, while boots sit above the ankle. Given their increased coverage, boots can offer a more secure fit, better stability, and greater overall protection. Similar to hiking shoes, most modern hiking boots are built with lightweight materials and strike a nice balance between agility and performance (even the Altra Lone Peak trail runner comes in a mid-height waterproof boot). That said, for anything but the most rugged of trails or the heaviest loads, we usually find ourselves reaching for a hiking shoe. You’ll have to decide for yourself, but both are viable options for day hiking, backpacking, and non-alpine peak bagging. For our breakdown of the top models—including everything from mid-height trail running shoes to traditional leather designs—see our article on the best women's hiking boots.
 

Women's Hiking Shoes FAQ

What's the difference between men's and women's hiking shoes?

Most hiking shoes are available in both men’s and women’s sizes. Women’s shoes are generally designed to fit narrower heels and higher arches, come in women’s-specific sizes and widths, and are offered in different colors. Some shoes will feature lower collars and different midsole density or material blends to compensate for women's lower ankle bones and lower body mass. But we don't think you should get too caught up in the gendered differences; what matters is comfort. While most of our female friends wear women’s shoes, some women might be better off opting for a men’s model, especially those with high-volume or wide feet. As with all clothing and footwear, your best bet is to try on before buying.
 

Do I really need a hiking shoe, or can I just wear my gym sneakers?

In most cases, we recommend investing in a pair of hiking shoes for foot protection, overall performance, and safety. You can get away with wearing sneakers on short, casual gravel trails, but for longer hikes on variable terrain, a hiking shoe is essential. For one, the outsole rubber compounds are designed to grip outdoor terrain, such as rocks, roots, and loose dirt, while gym shoes have smooth outsoles with little tread that provide traction on indoor floors or streets. Hiking shoes also feature thick outsoles, rock plates, and toe caps that protect the foot when hiking over rocks and roots. Casual sneakers will also wear down more quickly than hiking shoes, which feature more durable uppers and rubber outsoles. 
 

How do I prevent blisters on the trail?

There are several factors that go into blister prevention, and it starts with the fit of the shoe. When trying on the shoe for the first time (ideally before purchasing), note any hotspots or discomfort in the foot. Sizing up isn't always the solution if you're noticing hotspots; shoes that are too big can rub and cause blisters in other areas. Instead, finding a shoe that properly fits the foot with little discomfort out of the box is important (note that most shoes come with some degree of discomfort when breaking them in, but it should be minimal). Next, be sure to wear a breathable, moisture-wicking hiking sock. A dry foot is less prone to blistering. We've even had luck pre-treating our socks with Gold Bond powder, which absorbs moisture. If you know that you're prone to blistering in specific spots, you can also protect those areas with athletic tape (our favorite is Leuko tape), though you'll want to be sure to take it off at camp and replace it each time you start a hike to keep the area clean and moisture-free.
 

What's the difference between a budget shoe and a premium shoe?

In most cases, the differences between a budget shoe and a pricey, premium shoe come down to performance and durability. A budget shoe generally uses cheaper materials throughout, resulting in less grippy outsoles, uppers that form holes or wear through more quickly, and midsoles that wear out faster. For these reasons, it's rare for a shoe under $100 to make our list. That said, we don't think you need to opt for the most expensive shoe, either. Just because a shoe costs a lot doesn't mean it uses high-quality materials or performs well (watch out for gimmicky "tech" that often doesn't really improve the shoe but just raises the price). We do think it's worth spending up for a more premium shoe if you plan to tackle technical terrain or long-distance hikes, but more casual day hikers can get away with a less expensive, no-frills shoe. In the list above, we carefully consider each shoe's value and will include it only if we think the price is fair for what it offers.